April 08, 2020

Food stamp cuts blamed for growing U.S. hunger> Emergency meal demand up in wake of law change

CHICAGO — Congress’ rewrite of the nation’s welfare law wrung billions of dollars from the main federal program designed to keep the poor from going hungry: food stamps.

Now, four months after the last of $27 billion in food stamp cuts took effect, evidence is mounting of a large increase in the number of people who can’t get enough to eat without help. Surprised and worried by the news, charity leaders and experts on hunger believe the cuts are at least partly to blame.

“The economy is booming by most standards we use to measure it, and yet we’re saying our demand is up,” says Sister Christine Vladimiroff, a Benedictine nun who runs Chicago-based Second Harvest, the nation’s largest charity to getting food to the poor.

“People come to us because their cupboards are bare,” Vladimiroff said. “We don’t want to have to say, `Well, ours are, too.”‘

The U.S. Conference of Mayors released a survey last month that reported average 1997 increases of 16 percent in requests for emergency food — the largest jump in the 29-city survey since 1992. In addition, the study found that 19 percent of those seeking help were turned away, and 46 percent of the cities reported that charities and other private programs provided inadequate amounts of food to those helped.

Forty-four percent of city officials cited cuts in the food stamp program as a chief cause of the problem.

But many said the blame cannot be placed solely on the changes in the food stamp program, which reduced the stamps’ value, limited to three months the eligibility of able-bodied, childless adults and denied benefits to most legal immigrants. Other, perhaps larger, factors include unemployment and low-paying jobs, they said.

For instance, the Weld Food Bank in Greeley, Colo., reported one of the highest increases in the number of people asking for help — 50 percent — of any Second Harvest affiliate, but marketing manager Jim Riesberg cautioned against simple explanations.

“Sure it’s had a tremendous impact, but we can’t put everything off on the food stamp cuts,” Riesberg said. “It’s too easy.”

Second Harvest supplies through a network of food banks more than a billion pounds of food a year to soup kitchens, battered women’s shelters, meals-on-wheels programs for the elderly and other services for the downtrodden. In an informal survey, Second Harvest found it took an average of 14 percent more food to feed the hungry this November than last.

Matthew House, a service center for the homeless in the struggling Douglas neighborhood on Chicago’s South Side, sees such statistics played out firsthand. To try to make up for some of what the government will no longer do, the agency is moving from a tiny, crumbling church capable of serving only about 40 “guests” each mealtime to a newly renovated, spacious facility a few blocks away that can handle more than double that.

For people such as Everton Greenaway, who came to Chicago from Montserrat after the British colony’s volcano buried much of the Caribbean island two years ago, Matthew House is a haven. He works at odd jobs to try to make ends meet. But because he is no longer eligible for food stamps, Greenaway often winds up there for meals.

“I might be down, but I always remember that they respect us and love us,” he said after a recent breakfast.

Thirteen states have moved to keep food stamp benefits intact for some legal immigrants by spending their own money — ranging from $2.1 million in Maryland to $65 million in Washington state.

Have feedback? Want to know more? Send us ideas for follow-up stories.

comments for this post are closed

You may also like